Sunday, January 27, 2008
VeriChip Corporation - Infant "Protection"
- Journal of Healthcare Protection Management"
Instead of this statisic being the foundation of a pro-
"tagging" your infant argument to sell the people on how "good" RFID/National ID, Big Brother "so that we can protect you" etc. etc. is...parents should consider returning to the ancient and safe custom of birth at home.
Friday, January 25, 2008
Five Standards for Safe Childbearing - Awesome quote!
"It is a comment on our times that we, who want childbirth to again become an intimate family affair, filled with the security of one's home and the love and tenderness of one's family, are considered radicals." Doris Haire
Excerpts from the 5 Standards of Safe Childbirth
by David Stewart, PhD:
...Every study published shows midwives to be safer than doctors. Every study. No exceptions. If your physician disagrees with this, challenge him or her to produce the data that supports otherwise. They won't be able to do it. Such data does not and never did exist. In a nutshell, that is the strength of the case for midwifery. It is unanimous.
...In March of 1996, the Kansas State Supreme Court rules that midwifery is a distinct profession. The high court stated that "even if the midwife does something that could be construed as medical practice, it is not medical practice. It is midwifery. An activity is not incident to the practice of medicine just because it is engaged in by the members of the medical profession."
Dr. Stewart says, "Any practitioner who attends birth with an attitude of respect for individuality, support of nature, promoting health, and the preservations of normality by little or no intervention is, by our definition, a "midwife" even though he or she may hold a degree in medical doctoring."
To get a copy of the new, fully updated 1997 "Five Standards for Safe Childbearing" by David Stewart, Ph.D send $16.95, plus $3.00 shipping to NAPSAC, Rt. 1, Box 646, Marble Hill, MO 63764-9725, USA. (make checks payable to NAPSAC International, in US funds) reprints of the Midwifery article are $4.95 each, plus $1.50 shipping, and the Home Birth Chapter is $3.95, plus $1.50 shipping. *I have no financial or any other interest in NAPSAC, except I like the work the Stewarts do!*
Thursday, January 24, 2008
Saturday, December 29, 2007
N.J. Orders HIV Testing For Pregnant Women - washingtonpost.com
A bill signed into law Wednesday by the Senate president, Richard J. Codey, in his capacity as acting governor, requires two tests for pregnant women, at the beginning of the pregnancy and again in the third trimester, unless the mother objects. If the mother objects, the objection will be noted and the newborn will then be tested for HIV, with the only exception being on religious grounds. Newborns will also be tested if the woman tests positive."
Saturday, December 22, 2007
The Makers of Modern Schooling - John Taylor Gatto
The makers of modern schooling weren't at all who we think.
55 Reasons for Having a Home Birth
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
intro | homebirth | 55 reasons | the centre | directory | doula | waterbirth | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Birth Centre • 6 Abercorn, 15 Sycamore Road, Glenwood, Durban 4001 • Tel/Fax 031-2055876 • Email mwbirth1@mweb.co.za All information is subject to copyrights (Midwife Tracy Roake © 2001) |
Wednesday, December 05, 2007
U.S.'s low rank for newborns' survival - Kids and parenting- msnbc.com
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
World Class Hospital Overdoses Dennis Quaid's Twin Infants
November 22, 2007
"DENNIS Quaid's newborn twins remain fighting for their lives today after being given a drug overdose in hospital - a gaffe officials now admit is easily preventable. Quaid's children Thomas Boone and Zoe Grace, who were born earlier this month, were accidentally given 10,000-unit doses of the anti-coagulant Heparin at LA's Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre - 1000 times the normal amount.
The hospital's medical chief Michael Langberg today admitted the error was 'preventable' and involved 'a failure to follow our standard policies and procedures'. 'There is no excuse for that to occur,' he said, adding the babies 'indicated no adverse effects from the higher concentration of Heparin or from the temporary abnormal clotting function. Doctors continue to monitor the patients.'
He has also apologised to Quaid and his wife Kimberley Buffington."
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
Thursday, October 25, 2007
Tuesday, October 23, 2007
Obstetric death of West Boca woman
Special's lawyers agree that her death was catastrophic. But it was entirely preventable, attorney Andrew Yaffa said.
"Susan Special's water had broken about a month early and doctors decided she should have a Caesarean because her baby was in the breech position. "
Monday, October 22, 2007
Friday, October 19, 2007
Don't Sell Your Sisters Down the River - by Jan Tritten
The Midwives Alliance of North America (MANA) has always been an inclusive organization, a place for all midwives. MANA's whole foundation has been one of acceptance and unity. I was shocked, therefore, when I heard that the board had proposed that only licensed, certified professional midwives (CPMs) or certified nurse-midwives (CNMs) could be voting members. This proposal reeks of a witch hunt and will cause even worse separation in our already divided movement.
Midwifery was bruised and nearly broken in New York state in the mid-1990s when direct entry and lay midwives were outlawed, then replaced, by only those midwives coming out of an "approved" direct entry program. Is MANA planning this scene for the whole country? Will MANA members simply stand by in complicity? If so, another midwifery uprising will occur, bringing forth a new surge of lay midwives who are willing to serve women in a way that we can't. The flow of the river is carrying us in a direction we will soon be unable to resist. Midwifery will be back where it was several years ago, with a strong, illegal lay midwifery movement acting as a powerful undercurrent. The midwives of MANA will represent the status quo. We will have colluded with the patriarchal medical establishment so that it is against the law to practice anything the whim of medicine decides midwives should or shouldn't do. We will be limited soon by protocols that will hamstring us into practicing watered-down midwifery and will rob women of their birthing rights.
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
One of the many reasons hospital birth is dangerous.
"Most cases were life-threatening bloodstream infections. However, about 10 percent involved so-called flesh-eating disease, according to the study led by researchers at the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. There were 988 reported deaths among infected people in the study, for a rate of 6.3 per 100,000. That would translate to 18,650 deaths annually, although the researchers don't know if MRSA was the cause in all cases.
If these deaths all were related to staph infections, the total would exceed other better-known causes of death including AIDS — which killed an estimated 17,011 Americans in 2005 — said Dr. Elizabeth Bancroft of the Los Angeles County Health Department, the editorial author."
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
Nude Examinations
Nude examinations
Currently in vogue in western medicine is the routine giving of breast exams, pelvic exams, and rectal exams. As is often done by male doctors on female patients, women who are other men’s wives. The doctor says, “Take off your clothes,” and the client does. Do you give that kind of authority to anyone else? Some cultures in the world only allow female doctors to treat female patients. That strikes me as a wise course of action.
I am shocked by the callousness of some doctors and nurses in hospitals concerning nudity. Once, while making a pastoral hospital visit on a parishioner scheduled for surgery, I was shocked to walk through the open door of her room to find her face down on her bed, completely nude, the curtain around her bed and the door to her room both wide open for any to see. She had been prepped for surgery and left by the nurses, fully exposed and vulnerable to anyone
walking by. I immediately turned on my heel and left without her being embarrassed at knowing that I was even there. Is this kind of callous disregard for modesty and dignity what the Lord has ordained? Would YOU leave a person under your care exposed and naked and vulnerable for all to see? It would never cross my mind to do such a thing! Would it yours? What kind of crudeness and evil allows one to behave in such an ungodly manner?
Restoring Healthcare as a Ministry
Hospital childbirth is one unnecessary “surgery.”
The following information is summarized from Healing in Zion, pages 66-67: Hospital childbirth is extremely dangerous. The United States has 9.7 deaths per thousand births; Japan has 4.4; Sweden has 5.7. The U.S. ranks twenty-second in the world in maternal and neonatal safety, ranking below every other developed nation. The safest place is Holland, and there a large percentage of babies are born at home. Worldwide, doctors handle only two out of ten attended
births. Midwives oversee the rest.
Dr. Robert Mendelsohn recites the following statistics concerning
the dangers of giving birth in a hospital: “Babies born in U.S. hospitals are six times more likely to suffer distress during labor and delivery, eight times more likely to get caught in the birth canal, four times more likely to need resuscitation, four times more likely to become infected, and thirty times more likely to be permanently injured. Their mothers are three times more likely to hemorrhage.” (Heretic, p. 91)
Dr. Murray Enkin, professor emeritus of obstetrics at Canada’s McMaster University in Ontario for ten years, researched studies published in sixty major scientific journals on childbearing. In addition,
eighteen thousand obstetricians were interviewed to obtain unpublished data. The research revealed that “Much of what our doctors and hospitals do for pregnancy and birth is wrong, expensive
and dangerous...[They] routinely employ methods of care that not only offer little benefit to mother or infant, but actually can be dangerous to them.”
He evaluated 285 procedures and policies of care, and only 100 of them were rated as successful and safe. Sixty were rated as dangerous,
and should be abandoned; eighty-eight had unknown effect; thirty-seven were possibly effective.
Home birth is definitely safer than going to a U.S. hospital. A hospital turns what God designed to be a natural process into a
surgical experience. Only 5% of births have complications which may require a doctor. Because of this 5%, any woman planning on home childbirth should have a standby plan to go to a hospital if an emergency develops.
Stories that make you cringe
Some doctors go wild while you are under their control. While writing this book, I downloaded the following article off the internet from Associated Press Writer Verena Dobnik (January 21, 2000).
“NEW YORK - A doctor delivered a baby by Caesarean section, then used his scalpel to carve his initials into the mother’s abdomen.... Liana Gredz is now suing the 61-year-old obstetrician for $5 million, saying, the 3-by-1 1/2-inch “A” and “Z” ‘makes me feel like a branded animal.’
“According to the Daily News, witnesses in the operating room said that after delivering Gedz’s daughter on Sept. 7, Zarkin announced: ‘I did such a beautiful job, I’ll initial it.’
“‘I felt like I was raped,’ she told the Daily News. And now, with the scar that has turned into a welt, ‘I’m so embarrassed
to get undressed in front of my husband because I have another man’s initials on my stomach.’
“The couple is also suing Beth Israel Medical Center, where the child was delivered.”